Purchase an Option on a Celebrity channel now for $X and transfer it to the Celebrity later for $X+.
Declaration of a Peaceful Revolution
Goldilocks and the Three Major Questions Cases
This term, the Court has decided three cases that turn on the major questions doctrine: Alabama Association of Realtors, NFIB v. OSHA, and Biden v. Missouri. Each of these cases turn on whether Congress used sufficient language to delegate a power to executive branch. Admittedly, these three cases lack much guidance for the lower courts.
The trilogy reminds me of the classic fable, Goldilocks and the Three Bears. A little girl tries the porridge of three bears. The first bowl is too hot. The second bowl is too cold. The third bowl is just right.
In NFIB v. OSHA, the Court held that the OSH Act “plainly” does not authorize the mandate. In Alabama, the Court at least entertained the possibility that the delegation was “ambiguous,” but in the absence of a clear statement, the “sheer scope of the CDC’s claimed authority under §361(a) would counsel against the Government’s interpretation.” But in Biden v. Missouri, the Court found that “[t]he rule thus fits neatly within the language of the statute.”
Going forward, how are the lower courts to decide whether a delegation is in the Goldilocks Zone? Too clear, but limited to a particular context? Not clear enough, but reasonable? Or just right?
DISCLAIMER: Please note the display of any name, image, or likeness of any individual, organization, or item on this site must not be construed as an endorsement of this site by the owner of that which is depicted. Nor should the presence of the same be inferred by anyone as an indication the depicted is currently posting content or otherwise participating at this site in any way whatsoever. Additionally, we certainly will remove or replace any name, image, likeness, or item if requested to do so by the owner of the entity or item depicted. Please leave messages or requests in the Contact form above. Thank you!